Case Studies / Payments Intelligence
Sixty-seven representative engagements, drawn from more than 100 projects since 2023, told by vertical and mechanism, never by name. Realized, identified, or modeled value, labeled every time. Go look for yourself.
Showing all 67 engagements.
Selected Outcomes
The headline, the mechanism, and the evidence boundary stay in the same frame. No modeled value quietly becomes realized value on the way to the page.
Executed Negotiations
Two executed negotiations, shown with the distinctions finance teams need: measured, annualized, projected, and realized.
Roughly $260K was measured on processor-confirmed volume; the larger figures are explicitly annualized and projected.
Year-one effective fees moved from about 2.1% to 1.3%, roughly 75 basis points saved on approximately $50M of volume.
Compact summaries here; the complete 59-record docket follows below with every result grouped by service.
Executed processor agreements moved a church-management platform to wholesale-reseller IC+; ~$1.3M remains illustrative, not realized.
Executed agreements; migration underway.
Payments attachment moved from about 30% to roughly 65% in about a year; take rate approximately doubled.
Realized payments-program growth.
A processor was selected, beta completed, and the replacement payments program launched live.
Launched outcome; no savings dollar asserted.
$5M+ projected annual revenue from a new payer-sync model.
Projected outcome, kept explicitly modeled.
Multiple-six-figure refund and contract renegotiation reported for a withheld client.
Reported refund followed by a renegotiation.
Every row below carries the same sourcing discipline as the eight above. Some results are recoveries and savings; others are in-flight engagements or modeled scenarios, reported as such.
Get Started
The same forensic discipline behind these 67 engagements runs against your residuals, contract, transactions, and merchant statements, in about a week.
