Residual Audit

Prove Every Residual. Recover What You Are Owed.

Straata rebuilds the Merchant → Processor → ISV residual chain from source evidence, quantifies the claim, and packages the recovery path.

Residual Reconciliation Chain4 Of 4 Sources Ready
DATA ROOM / 4 OF 4 RECONCILIATION RAIL / SIX STEPS FILE 01Residual reports FILE 02Contract + Schedule A FILE 03Transaction detail FILE 04Merchant statements CANONICALMERCHANT JOIN 01Score thedata room 02Reconcile againstSchedule A 03Detect padding +tier leakage 04Cross-check merchantstatements 05 / REJOINSize theclaim 06Pick the recoverypathway CONTRACT PARSING / PARALLEL WORKSTREAM REJOINS AT CLAIM SIZING DATA ROOM / 4 OF 4 FILE 01Residual reports FILE 02Contract + Schedule A FILE 03Transaction detail FILE 04Merchant statements CANONICAL MERCHANT JOIN RECONCILIATION RAIL / SIX STEPS 01Score the data room 02Reconcile Schedule A 03Detect tier leakage 04Cross-check statements 05 / REJOINSize the claim 06Pick recovery pathway CONTRACT PARSINGPARALLEL WORKSTREAM
The Problem

A Residual CSV Reports A Payout. It Does Not Prove The Math.

Legacy ISO and referral relationships often leave the processor’s export as the only apparent source of truth. PE owners inherit the same blind spot across an entire portfolio.

“The only reason a processor emits an opaque CSV is to make the calculations hard to follow.”The operating premise, lightly adapted
processor_residual.csvIllustrative Structure
ResidualReportedBasis absentReference absentUnproven
Fee 17DeductedFormula absentNot listedException
Dual MIDSplitJoin absentOne merchantUnmatched
Rate changeAppliedDate absentOld scheduleDrift
Missing 01

The formula that turns merchant economics into partner residual.

Missing 02

The contract reference that authorizes each deducted cost.

Missing 03

The merchant-level join that collapses duplicate MIDs and rails.

No single input verifies the chain alone. The payout becomes evidence only after all four sources agree.
Legacy Book

ISVs and resellers still paid through older ISO or referral agreements.

Portfolio View

PE owners who need one comparable monitoring cadence across multiple holdings.

What You Get

A Claim Artifact Built To Survive Scrutiny.

Confirmed dollars, not estimates: every figure separates what is proven now from what is pending one named missing report.

Residual Claim PositionEvidence Tied / Decision Ready
Claim Number 01

In-Window Refund

The back-claim supported inside the contractual recovery window, period by period and line by line.

Confirmed Now

Every amount tied to the source files already present.

Pending Data

Held outside the confirmed claim until one named report arrives.

Claim Number 02

Cumulative Systematic

The broader historical pattern plus the active-merchant run rate that continues until the formula is corrected.

Confirmed Now

The proven periods and the ongoing formula behind them.

Pending Data

The expanded history that remains explicitly assumption-free.

Lever 01

Retroactive Credit

Correct the payout and credit the documented in-window variance.

Lever 02

Renegotiation Lever

Use the pattern and run rate to reset economics and controls.

Lever 03

Material Breach

Escalate when the agreement and evidence support that posture.

The supporting package includes the reconciliation summary, line-item recomputation, anomaly log, exposure summary, and recovery posture.

How It Works

Six Steps From Raw Files To A Recovery Path.

The rail is sequential. Contract parsing runs beside it, while the canonical merchant join keeps dual MIDs and dual rails from fragmenting the same economic relationship.

01Score
Score the data room.

Grade coverage across residual reports, the contract and Schedule A, transaction detail, and merchant statements. Every limit is named in the claim file.

02Reconcile
Reconcile residuals against Schedule A.

Recompute every residual line from first principles. A fee not authorized by Schedule A cannot quietly become an allowed cost inside the split.

03Detect
Detect padding and tier leakage.

Test fee bases, pricing tiers, revenue-share logic, merchant assignments, and impossible rates against the applicable published ceiling.

04Cross-Check
Cross-check merchant statements.

Sample six to nine merchants across size tiers, then rebuild volume, buy rate, and event count to verify what merchants were actually charged.

05Size
Size the claim.

Separate the in-window refund from cumulative systematic exposure, and confirmed-now dollars from amounts pending one named data source.

06Recover
Pick the recovery pathway.

Package the finding for a retroactive credit, a renegotiation lever, or a material-breach posture supported by the agreement.

Proof / Public-Safe And De-Identified

The Evidence Has Produced Material Recoveries.

Each figure carries its evidence state. Executed means money recovered. Identified means a claim sized as owed from the available evidence.

Executed / Recovery $1.345M

Recovered in one de-identified ISV residual audit.

Identified / Claim Sized $2.6M to $3.5M

Sized as owed, including roughly $302K per year of active-merchant underpayment.

Executed / Portfolio $20M

Recovered across clients in 6 months.

In roughly half of audits we find a material error.

These are separate, anonymized outcomes. They demonstrate the method and its evidence states, not the size or result of any future audit.

Fit Check

Built For Books Where The Reporting Rail Cannot Prove Itself.

The Residual Audit earns its depth when the agreement, payout report, merchant billing, and underlying activity have never been reconciled as one chain.

Engagement Fit RegisterScope Before Data Request
Strong Fit
Legacy Book

ISO or referral residuals assembled under an older agreement, with limited formula transparency.

Claim Window

Normally at least 12 months, and 24 or more months where the contract supports a larger back-claim.

Portfolio Cadence

PE owners who want an initial baseline and recurring Trend Tab monitoring across holdings.

Not For
Transparent Rail

Books already operating on modern, line-level reporting with clean source continuity.

Schedule A Parity

Programs where every tested fee, rate, merchant assignment, and payout already reconciles cleanly to the agreement.

What Happens Next

Start With Evidence. Leave With A Recovery Path.

Book a call if you already suspect a residual gap. If the claim still needs to be sized, begin with the Payments Diagnostic. If the finding is ready to become leverage, move into Contract Negotiation.